Building review

See what the building is doing in winter.

PENGA lines up gas history, weather, current controls, winter symptoms, and boiler-room context for the building you already suspect. The result is a clearer call on whether deeper modelling belongs in the conversation.

Use existing records Invite plant context Controls stay put

Start Building Review Send to Operator

Review packet

What gets checked first

Gas historyWinter use, cold snaps, and obvious outliers.

Plant contextOutdoor reset, boiler controller, manual tuning, or shallow BAS.

Comfort riskCold calls, overheating, and which suites set the heat floor.

No boiler commands, setpoint changes, or BAS edits during the first review.

What happens first

A good review makes the next conversation easier.

You leave with a yes, maybe, or no on fit, plus the facts needed for the next technical conversation.

Fit reply

Is this building a yes, a maybe, or a poor first target for PENGA?

Records to pull

Which bills, trends, weather periods, and plant facts would make the pattern clearer?

Plant input

The operator, power engineer, or contractor can name what would be unsafe, missing, or annoying.

Next move

Stop, gather better data, tune conventionally, or plan a controls conversation.

Building information

Use the facts already close to the building.

The strongest first read comes from ordinary owner and operator material: bills, weather, plant records, controls history, and clearly bounded comfort-risk signals.

12 to 24 months of gas history when available.
Weather context and cold-snap periods.
Plant telemetry from existing systems if approved and practical.
Mechanical-room context from the operator or contractor.
Comfort-risk signals only where privacy, consent, and written boundaries are clear.

Read-only boundary

The consultation does not change how the plant runs.

The point is to understand the building before physical changes enter the conversation.

No boiler commands, setpoint changes, pump changes, valve changes, or BAS schedule edits during the assessment.
No tenant personal data or in-suite surveillance is required for the first review.
No active control proposal is made without building data, operator input, and the appropriate implementation review.

Sequence

From building facts to a useful next step.

A good first engagement narrows the work instead of expanding it: what is known, what is missing, who weighs in, and what comes next.

Choose the building

Establish the building profile, owner authority, operating pain, and available data.

Build the record

State what gets read, what stays untouched, and who reviews the work.

Model the opportunity

Compare actual operation with likely heat-waste, comfort-risk, and control-response patterns.

Define the next move

Give the owner a clear recommendation, including the conditions for any controls work.